<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Panasonic FX500K</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.10digitalcameras.com/panasonic/lumix-dmc-fx500k-ratings/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.10digitalcameras.com/panasonic/lumix-dmc-fx500k-ratings</link>
	<description>The 10 Best Digital Cameras Around</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 04:35:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harris</title>
		<link>http://www.10digitalcameras.com/panasonic/lumix-dmc-fx500k-ratings/comment-page-1#comment-125</link>
		<dc:creator>Harris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 18:16:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.10digitalcameras.com/?p=295#comment-125</guid>
		<description>First of all, I can&#039;t comment much on the value for the money, since my purchase was based solely on features and I was willing to pay for them. I searched for 6 months for a camera that met my requirements (in this order).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First of all, I can&#8217;t comment much on the value for the money, since my purchase was based solely on features and I was willing to pay for them. I searched for 6 months for a camera that met my requirements (in this order).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.10digitalcameras.com/panasonic/lumix-dmc-fx500k-ratings/comment-page-1#comment-87</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 09:51:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.10digitalcameras.com/?p=295#comment-87</guid>
		<description>This camera takes great photos, but I&#039;d recommend trying it out in person first. The wide angle lens is amazing, and the photos are solid. HD video looks good, but in low light it gets a little grainy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This camera takes great photos, but I&#8217;d recommend trying it out in person first. The wide angle lens is amazing, and the photos are solid. HD video looks good, but in low light it gets a little grainy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
